Сообщение №4255 от socratus , 02 апреля 2009 г. 12:57:
Going back to the Einstein’s question.
In his Miracle 1905 Einstein wrote the Fourth paper: “ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.” ( SRT). And as a postscript to his forth, the Fifth paper: “ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”As he realized the answer was: “ Yes, it depends on its energy E= Mc^2.”It means what SRT must be connected with E= Mc^2 . It means what must be connection between Lorentz’s transformation and E= Mc^2.April 2009.The same Einstein’s question in a little detail interpretation: “Does the inertia of a body ( for example: of a light quanta or of an electron) depend upon its energy content E=Mc^2 ?”Thinking logically, the answer must be : Yes, it depends.” When new question arise: ” How is possible to understand the connection between E=Mc^2 and E=ht or E= kb or E= hf. ?”On my opinion " The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass" (according to one single light quanta /electron ) gives answer to this question..The problem is that now nobody wants to ask yourself that „The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass" means according to one single light quanta / photon /electron. ============== . . Best wishes. Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus. http://www.socratus.com http://www.wbabin.net http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2548 ================