Two sights of the Vacuum. In a modern science there are two mutually exclusive points of view on behaviour of particles in Vacuum. One point of view is a position of classical physics which approves, that In Vacuum at T=0K any movement of particles stops. And if in the Empire of a cold there is no movement is a dead empire.
But other point of view completely rejects this formulation. This point of view is expressed with the quantum theory. In 1911 of M. Planck has offered, that energy does not address in zero at aspiration to T=0K. He has declared this on 1-st Solvay congress.
« Energy at T=0K » became the main problem in the physics, because, « the Physics is first of all Vacuum ». Gradually began to approve, that Vacuum T=0K is not empty dead space, there lives the "virtual" particles. These particles originally have negative and imaginary mass, and then make « virtual transition » and get positive mass, become real particles. But as thus look mystical « virtual particles » as they make « virtual transitions » anybody particularly does not explain. Let's think over these "virtual" particles. Let's ask a question: What geometrical form of "virtual" particles In Vacuum T=0K? The answer: According to the laws of physics (J. Charles, Gay-Lussac, V. Nernst, A. Einstein ) that particles in Vacuum cannot have volume and consequently should to be flat figures. Means, particles have the geometrical form - a circle, as from all flat figures the circle has the most optimum form: Ñ/D=p. What do these "virtual" circles in Vacuum? The answer is given with the theory of radiation of absolutely black body. The theory considers area of the space which are being absolute thermal balance. It is possible only at Ò=0Ê. But it is known, that such condition is a « thermal death ». And in the nature it is not observed. Therefore Planck, studying this area, has come to conclusion: that condition Ò=0Ê has changed, in this space there should be a radiation of quantum of light, possessing an internal impulse h=Et=1. So, « the virtual circle » is transformed to quantum of light. This quantum of light has an impulse h=Et=1 and flies with constant speed ñ=1. From this assumption the Quantum theory was born. Therefore the Quantum theory is a theory only about Quantum of light and him various transformations. And the Classical theory considers all other particles. These particles have mass much greater than quantum of light and move with speeds much smaller than quantum of light. If we shall understand a difference between quantum of light and all other particles, that all contradictions in the physics disappear, and all physics becomes harmoniously integral science.
The Vacuum and the Electron All know, that an electron is not a firm sphere. All know, that its form can be changed. But nobody understands the borders of the change of the geometrical form of the electron. So, what are the borders of this change? Quantum theory gives an answer to this question. It says that at the interaction of the electron with the vacuum, the energy and mass of the electron become infinite. Physics does not understand what to do with infinite sizes and therefore have thought up "a method of renormalization", a method "to sweep the dust under the carpet" / Feynman./ But the situation can be understood another way. Electrons, having the geometrical form of a sphere, lose their volume and turn into an indefinitely flat circle. In this is the reason for the occurrence of infinite sizes for the electron. But in physics we know only one particle which has the form of a flat circle. It is a quantum of light which flies rectilinearly with speed c= 1. Hence, the electron turns into a quantum of light. Hence, the electron and a quantum of light is the same particle in different states. In the books it is written, that electrons interact among themselves with the help of a quantum of light. In the books it is written that an electron in an atom passing from one orbit to another radiates a quantum of light. It should be understood as follows. The electron has a quantum of light in a pocket or under a "shirt" which from time to time is freed. Interesting. But why is it necessary for it to hide? * * * If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site http://www.socratus.com Socratus.
The Vacuum and Special Relativity Theory. Special Relativity Theory examines the behaviour of a quantum of light in the vacuum. 1) The First law of SRT - the speed of a quantum of light in vacuum has a maximal magnitude (constant, absolute) of c=1. 2) SRT is not considered a gravitational field. For this reason, Einstein created General Relativity Theory in 1915. The field in which there is no gravitation is a vacuum. 3) This asserts that action in SRT occurs with particles in negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space. This space is absolute. Mathematicians have constructed its model and speak of this negative space as completely abstract. Nobody sees that it has no connection to real existence. This is similar to a sad joke. For 100 years everyone has admired SRT. Millions of articles, reviews and books have been written and the United Nations has decided to establish 2005 as the centennial year of SRT. Consider that all that is clear in this theory is that negative four-dimensional space is abstract and has no real existence. My God! There does not appear to be anyone to laugh at this joke! Everyone searches for complex models of four-dimensional space, but truth lies in simplicity. All is very simple. We meet the negative characteristic of space only in the vacuum, and in the vacuum, space is merged with time (negative four-dimensional space). According to the first law, the speed of light is absolute and movement occurs in the absolute vacuum. So why does everyone speak and write that there is no absolute movement; that only relative movement v =s/t is real? Why does everyone say that there is no absolute reference system, if the absolute speed can be only in absolute space? Here we have one of the paradoxes in human intelligence.
Two views on the space and time. 1. There are an independent space and independent time: We notice it on our planet - Earth. It is a fhree - dimensional space. 2. There is simultaneous union of space and time: It is negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space. Herman Minkowski : “ Henceforth, space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.” Question. What is the “a kind of union of the two “? The answer. It is Vacuum. T=0K.
Universe and Vacuum. Abstraction and reality . Now we build the base of a science on abstract ideas. The base of the classical mechanics is constructed on abstract separate absolute space and abstract separate absolute time of Newton. The base of thermodynamics is constructed on the abstract ideal gas theory. The base of the theory of radiation is constructed on the abstract black body theory. The base of SRT is constructed on the abstract theory of four-dimensional space theory. On this abstract base, physicists build a concrete building of science and are surprised when they discover paradoxes in it. But may be the abstract ideas are not abstract ones. * * * It is consider now, that absolute temperature of the Universe is Ò=2,7Ê. It is an absolute reference system (now). But we all know that our Universe is expanding...... This temperature ( Ò=2,7Ê ) is not constant, and continues to decrease and, hence, in the future will decrease down to Ò=0Ê. * * * In the physics models of the Vacuum have been created long time ago. These are: 1) the Theory of ideal gas. 2) the Theory of absolutely black body. 3) Negative four-dimensional space (Minkowski space - SRT). There is no need to discover America again, to build new theories of the Vacuum. If we want to understand Vacuum it is necessary to ask: “ What a geometrical and physical parameters the particles in Vacuum T=0K can have?” Thanks. Best wishes. Socratus.
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything . ====================. Could the vacuum contain dark energy, gravity particles, and frictionless gears? by Tim Folger published online July 18, 2008
When the next revolution rocks physics, chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless infinite void.